"Innocent" until proven guilty?
...or even better...
In a true free market (libertarian world) you are allowed to buy and sell drugs, AND you don't have a Gov giving you welfare if/when you mess up your life.
It's called personal responsibility and many people would choose to avoid the heavy, destructive drugs.
He is innocent until proven guilty - so he must be innocent! Yeah, set him free! Freedom reigns. Who could be against freedom? Let Ross go!
Idiot.
"In a true free market (libertarian world) you are allowed to buy and sell drugs" - you are also free to kill anyone who you determine deserves it. So watch the fuck out cause I'd kill you first. If things are going to be truly free, then no government is going to suppress me and tell me who I can and can't kill and rape. Free for all baby!!!!
How did the bitcoin community get so many morons?
I think you're mixing libertarianism and anarchists. I doubt libertarians agree with murder. They want limited government and protection of civil liberties. That tells me you know nothing about the law because a JD studies government first.
Everyone is missing the obvious reason why defendants counsel would use this defense - the evidence against him must be overwhelming. It's probably a good strategy to say, "I don't care how much evidence you have against my client because he shouldn't be on trial anyway. It might work.