For example, a ANN thread of a trusted site may contain few bad reviews but majority of the reviews will be good ones and we can judge the site is worth playing at. On the other hand, a scam site ANN thread may have fee good reviews but majority will be the complains which will give the idea about the site. This is the power of bitcointalk where we will mostly get the true picture of the gambling site.
Theoretically, this is true. In fact, it can be said that there is no better space than this forum to search for good and objective reviews to a certain extent. However, evaluations must always be dealt with objectively as well, taking into consideration that they are always individual viewpoints that have nothing to actually moderate them.
Agree, all ANN Thread reviews explain facts and are reliable sources of experience and user reviews on casinos, although the assessment of each individual's point of view is not moderated because they explain their own opinions, but if reports are found that indicate negative indications towards the casino in terms of reputation and unfair play then other users judge the report based on facts and checks on the casino.
Relatively casinos that have earned the reputation and trust of users have no negative indications of defrauding gamblers, but that is the point that needs to be periodically evaluated on the level of winning opportunities and many other things that need to be reviewed from the gambling system and rules which have the potential to change without notice.