To be honest, I would love if you could propose a solution to the problem other than complaining about it forever.
I've already said it a hundred times, doubling capacity at every halving!
Bigger blocks is not a solution, that's one thing for certain.
Nope, that's your opinion,
not a certainty, and please don't start comparing again with forks it's like saying that Acombolofulo payments doesn't need worldwide servers for their business
Maybe, but that's what you do: you alleviate it, you don't solve it.
At least it's doing something other than praying for a magical fix.
If you rise the block size limit, then you're destroying the fee market competition,
Yup just like Ford destroyed car manufacturing, like jumbo jets destroyed air travel, like huge chain hotels destroyed tourism and so on..
It's just funny that no matter what no matter how many people use bitcoin, no matter how much they use it we should stick to this 1MB block because that will do it no matter what, good that the world population is not going up because I would envision 2500 with 200 billion people all competing to get their tx in the same 1 MB block.
So, I'm all ears. What's the solution since merely changing a block size limit constant won't resolve the issue?
I've already said it, there is only one, and I am also all ears what do you think the solution would be?