Asides from the argument against block bloat, why would a coin network which allows for your coins to be 'seized' through edict issued by companies and organisations founded by its criminal creator, be considered as 'superior'?

And don't quote the asinine claim that for a currency to be 'legit' it has to conform to 'the law', because Bitcoin is a global network with no central authority and no single jurisdiction 'the law' could even be based on. What would be legal in one country is illegal in another.

BSV's 'coin seizure' function is anathema to EVERYTHING the real Satoshi envisioned and if you don't know that then you clearly don't know anything about Bitcoin's intentional design. This was just Craig's attempt to keep spinning his false narrative to constantly have a product to sell to Calvin 'Soon™' which would result in them stealing the forked Satoshi coins and the '1Feex' etc addresses he never owned and he convinced his ayrehead mark that it would then serve as precedent for yet more court adventures to attempt same on the BTC network for the grand prize.

It was an attempted heist put together by a word-salad spouting confident idiot and his moronic mark. That's the whole purpose of everything Craig did with BSV from the moment he forked Bitcoin.