Why are you so obsessed with this "corrupt government" argument? It's completely irrelevant to the topic at hand.
It is very relevant, because you're under the delusion that every dollar bill represents a portion of debt, which is not true if the government issues money that isn't owed to anyone. Your argument suggesting that the current monetary system isn't based on faith is simply incorrect. It functions as long as there's trust that the government acts responsibly.
In Bitcoin there is nothing that can be corrupted, that's why it has captured widespread interest. It represents a wholly novel and innovative monetary system. Your difficulty in grasping it comes from denying money existing without debt.
Historically, even the most corrupt governments issued fiat currency units as debt. The problem was that these governments defaulted on that debt which caused hyperinflation. So even if your fantasy scenario about the dollar becomes reality, every issued dollar would still represent a portion of debt. It's is just that the value of the assets behind that debt would be small. But again, what that has to do with the topic at hand. Bitcoin units are not issued as debt. They don't hold a debt-based asset, nor any other asset for that matter. They are as empty as Monopoly money. This topic is about the stupidity of transferring or managin empty units and spending tones of energy in the process. It's seems that you're so desperate in finding excuses for that stupidity that you just have to say something. No matter how irrelevant or irrational it is.