So I decided for simplicity to just go with the same top ten payouts as we did last year:
0.1
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.015
0.014
0.013
0.012
0.011
= 0.305
What's left after fees will go to the highest overall weekly round (ten match rounds or less are only counted). First place is currently Colorpoll54 who got 23 points all the way back from the first round, so that's who you need to beat. There are 8 rounds left to play.
(
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5458848.0) here is a post from the ofifcal topic
https://i.imgur.com/zw9dcpE.png .
20 people were supposed to win. In the next season, if you win and take the first place, I suggest that you change the rules 10 rounds before the end when you know more or less who won to change the pot only for the winner.
Would that be as fair as what you have just done? Did someone write this or is everyone licking their ass? Why can't you
just set the rules and stick to them, but just get creative?
You're mistaken. It literally states ten places:
The first place jackpot prize will be a guaranteed 0.1BTC and then the rest of the money will be split between 2nd-10th places.
The payouts you quoted literally state it was for the previous season. I didn't post the actual paid places until later in the season but that's why I decided to stick to the same as last seasons, just minus the top 11-20th places as already stated. I wouldn't change how many people got paid mid season if I stated it was more but that's not what it was.
