- I just noticed what you said, Op. What do you mean by betting on the opposite of your analysis? Is this what you think will win but you will actually lose, and what you think will lose but your bet will be correct? Is this what you mean?
Because it appears from the experiment you did that you challenged that with your own strategy that you use when you play gambling in the crypto gambling business, it seems like that's what you want to convey.
Yeah, what he believes gonna be the winner from his analysis then he bets on it for Lossing just opposite of what he analysize. And vice versa, this method remind me of old school days were we choose opposite of what we think is the right answer and end up getting it correctly.
For me OP, is tryna finding an edge of which I believe he has gotten. The truth is, OP should leverage on that if it works and probably adapt it because and sort out means to improve more . It happens most at times, we need to man up and get rid of emotion, huge expectancy as gamblers.
This is why gambling is called an activity that really cannot be predicted because after all the results at the end of the session are always random, and you have proven that when you gamble by choosing decisions that are not in accordance with your analysis but the results even win and I think it is very clear that in random activities the scenario will continue to be different, or different times then the results will also be different even if for example you do it with the same method, meaning that it does not mean that choosing decisions that are not in accordance with our analysis will always result in victory.
Yes it is a new way found by OP but however we must return to a straight understanding of gambling which is still gambling where whatever the way or whatever the method is the results will not always be in accordance with our expectations, meaning don't put too much hope in the methods we believe in.