Coming here from a tag.

I read the whole thread and each of the posts within, sans the links that somewhat became very abundant, safe for some links from the beginning of the thread. Maybe it's my lack of understanding on how fairlay works, and visiting the site doesn't do much help [I think AHOYBRAUSE shared the same sentiment as me] as it didn't enlighten me by much, but from what I can gather so far, I think every posts here just complicate something that's otherwise simple?

If I may ask,

One, did the decision that the game was rigged come from your own team or is it coming from a sportsbook provider you use? Based on the discussion this far, as well as from what I can infer from your site, it doesn't seem you have a sportsbook provider, so the decision came from your own. It doesn't hurt to clarify though, hence I ask.

Second, the basis of your bets cancelation is that it's a rigged game? Do you mind to point us out to which clause from your ToS allows you to confiscate a bet with such nature? Far as I can gather, it's just bad lines and these three,



And newfish1, this doesn't instantly says you're not guilty and out of the spotlight. I know you mentioned that you placed bets on many things, depending on the odds, offer availability, limits, etc. and that you have many accounts on many other sportbook. I am interested to know why you zeroed into those exact matches. Forgive me if it's been asked and answered, or if the evidence has been provided in form of wall of text before, I tend to skip those log of matches you've keep providing.

So, to help me, is it possible and do you mind to provide your recent betting history across books? I think one or two weeks around early to mid May is good and will be much appreciated.