As i mentioned before I have yet to show some other hard evidence of Fairlay's wrongdoing, but I would rather show it after we agree on an arbitrage panel, as I feel after people see it, Fairlay may back out ...
Lets all agree on a panel.
P.S. When everything is agreed on, I would share all the evidence and answer any questions asked (I have already provided a lot of information, answered a lot of questions, while Fairlay ignores everything and is yet to answer a single question from the community).
P.S.2 As promised before I still have to share information on my betting strategy and why those bets where taken. As promised, I would do it even before Fairlay finally agrees on a panel. I am not them, I have nothing to hide.
Great to see the civilised manner in which you are dealing with this entire ordeal. Evidence that Fairlay provided does make your betting behaviour seem quite shady, but it doesn't automatically confirm their claims as facts.
As you mentioned yourself, a reputed arbitrator could resolve this entire mess pretty quickly. Also, I don't see them backing out since they literally suggested it themselves.