They keep changing coaches like selfies, no matter how experienced a coach is, it will take him a long time to understand the club. Because it is not possible to do everything at the beginning, because no matter how experienced a coach is, he has to spend one to two or three seasons to convince the team that he can fully teach his team with good experience. However, I don't support the Chelsea team changing the coach so much, the coach should be given time only if he can take the team to the top with his experience.
No matter how much Chelsea tries to change coaches, I think Chelsea will not be as successful as before because the previous Chelsea did not often take quick decisions which ultimately destroyed the club itself because any coach also needs time to bring the club to success. If we look at Pochettino's abilities we will see Chelsea's progress has been significant compared to last season, but unfortunately the management doesn't see that and only wants to see Chelsea at the top level without seeing the coach's struggle when he is working hard to train the club to perform well in the remaining matches so that they manage to finish in 6th place.
We'll see how Chelsea performs next season with their new coach, whether it can be better than Pochettino or worse than before because Chelsea has too high expectations and tends to fire the coach as quickly as possible if they don't meet expectations. Todd Boehly has not achieved success like the previous Chelsea owner Roman Abramovich because Todd Boehly wasted too much money by recruiting young players and easily changing coaches compared to what the previous owner did who understood the situation and was good at managing management so that Chelsea could be successful in his hands.
To me I don't really think the players or the coaches are to blame, who is the major cause of the struggling of Chelsea football club is the owners, they have practically reduced the club to an average club, why would they be buying young star that haven't been proven for a very large amount of money against the manager wish, and to make matter worse, they have practically interfere in every decision of the manager, and that is the main reason Thomas tuchel was sacked, because their was a pushback from him, he refused to concur to their style of doing things, so he was sacked.
Ok let's look at Mauricio pochettino, he took the Chelsea job as a
yes man. initially they told him that he wouldn't have a say on who goes in and out of the club, and he agreed, but toward the end of the season when he kicked against the idea of selling Gallagher, he was sacked, so with this type of leadership, I don't see Chelsea achieving anything big, because their is too much interference and the owners wouldn't let his employees to do their jobs.