You should know that Erik ten Hag was successful in his first season at Manchester United, because Erik ten Hag managed to make Manchester United finish in third place in his first season. Therefore, even if, for example, Erik ten Hag was at Chelsea and was successful like that in his first season, then of course Chelsea would not sack him either.
Chelsea is not like Manchester United, the owners don't give second chance and they're not relenting when the appointed coach in charge looks incompetent. Todd Boehly sack Mauricio Pochettino and was bad news for the Blues because Mauricio Pochettino have sealed the europa spot but couldn't convert his chances. Manchester United hooked up with Erik Ten Hag because he was the man for the job. He deliver quite exceptional tasks for the growth of the Red Devils. Erik Ten Hag would have been successful in Chelsea.
That is the problem we are having with Chelsea, the idea of always wanting their team to win trophies under the first season management of their new coaches which is never certain to happen. Chelsea started quite wrongly and of course took some time to adapt but later on they improved which they ended their Premier League season on the 6th position but looking back from where they came from, atleast Chelsea should have been considerate to retain Pochettino for a while because everyone believes his going to improve.
I think personally it would be the other way round, Pochettino will be more successful compared to Ten Hag if he managed United because they really fell out by ending below Chelsea.
Chelsea is a team that adores their fans when they worship them, they are a team with pride even when they are failing. What were you expecting from them? Its so sad they always have to make there coaches put up the best performances in there debut season. And its the same time they did in the case of Pochettino. First the players he is working with was not signed by him but by the club and he is only a manager which would manage the players to win but he cant join them in the field. I think Pochettino had dome more tha enough for the club Chelsea, the fans value the things he did, i also believe that if he would coach Chelsea one more season they will perform better than their previous.
I'm worried that the bad things that Chelsea always do, which always fire coaches like this, will make experienced coaches out there afraid to join Chelsea because their reputation will be bad if they only get mediocre results in one season and after that they are fired and the coach is considered a failure. in handling Chelsea's performance.
Like Pochettino's case, fans initially doubted it, but after approaching the FA Cup title race, Chelsea fans became convinced that Pochettino had a positive influence on Chelsea's performance, but after that he was fired from Chelsea, which made fans angry with Chelsea management who ignored Pochettino's contribution.
I agree with you that in the coming season, if Pochettino is retained, Chelsea will definitely get their best performance when Pochettino already knows what to do and now everything is in vain.
At the start of the upcoming season, Chelsea will have to start the game by adapting to a new coach which will take a long time and will only take time to build chemistry with the new coach.