Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine[In Progress]

Jedna lasta ne čini proljeće

It just doesn't work:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L8IBwse5sgQ&t=3201s

Western systems are just worthless:

https://x.com/simpatico771/status/1783247000059728064

Worthless Abrams's stuck in mud:

https://odysee.com/@SENIORENSICHT:a/ukraine-blamage-f%C3%BCr-bejubelte:6

Again, you have provided opinion, but no fact, no substance, just narrative. Apart from a tank stuck in the mud (Seriously? A tank stuck? you are not even trying are you?)

I am sure the Ruzzian soldiers in the front could tell a different story. If there were alive after the attacks with all those weapons that "do not work".

I do give credit to the fact that Ruzzia has a good degree of EW, but what I have seen is that it makes it more difficult that's all. One of the obvious problems is that the number of systems is limited.

On the AWACS, I can clearly see how Ukraine is going to develop a proper air force, while quite small, with right defence capabilities. On one side, air defences that are adequate - albeit more would be helpful, then AWACS picking up the Su and Mig that are bombing or being used to launch some missiles and then F16s that will be unlikely to be able to attack freely, but will be there with european Meteor missiles (200 km range) and HARM missiles ready to be shot to anything detected.

I can see a new year in which the air space of Ukraine is going to be full of risks to the Ruzzian "Aerospatial" forces. It is extremely difficult to scape a Meteor - ramjet engine, agile, difficult to pick up...

Dismissing all sources from reputable news agencies as false opinions only to post about your own visions Roll Eyes

do tell what else do you see in your dreams, so we can completely switch to just shitposts.

Funny how you briefly mentioned R37 It is designed to shoot down tankers, AWACS and other C4ISTAR aircraft[1] while keeping the launch platform out of range of any fighters that might be protecting the target. According to Janes there are two variants, the R-37 and the R-37M; the latter conceived as having a jettisonable rocket booster that increases the range to "300–400 km" (160–220 nm). and make sure to totally ignore the range of S-400 with some missiles going to 400km and don't think about what already happened to most of UA air force planes, and try to evade the fact that Russia can hit any target in UA while planes need active runways to land at. Other than that, your dreams of few old planes being yet another game-changing weapons system which this time will surely tip the balance, makes a good morale booster for unsophisticated reader.

Yet the people who are providing the F-16s and the AWACS know of the R-37 and the s400 (claimed) capabilities. does this tell you anything? do you think they are simply making a mistake?

I would encourage you to understand how planes have to fight in an unsafe / contested airspace and why the R-37 and the Meteor are completely different beasts.