First of all, I will say that it is easy to win matches when you are paying the referees so that the decisions go your way.
Like they had one of the best and most balanced squads in the whole world, they could even do that without paying the referees, to be honest.
But that brings the question, if they could actually do that without the referees, they wouldn’t have paid them in the first place.
I hope everybody knows which club I am talking about.

I'd prefer you don't be a troll and talk football like a reasonable football lover. In over a year, not a single piece of evidence has been brought forward for the case, in fact, the prosecution couldn't find a single evidence, just throwing tantrums and hoping on the media to do theirs. The media, who generates more clicks from negative news like this didn't even care about all that. They put them out there so people like you can digest them without thinking. Now that the charges have been dropped, it didn't trend because that's not the kind of news that generates clicks.
I don't know which is funnier, that people believed paying the head of referees will help a team win games or that FC Barcelona has which is not the favourite club in Spain (statistics shows) have the power to be rig matches, in a league that has everybody's favourite, Real Madrid.
At the end of the day, Barcelona are still the biggest losers in this, because their name has already been dirtied. Even with the court ruling, ignorants like you still believe they bribed referees, even after exonerating themselves.