The user already has the forum support without dropping any evidence. It isn't even up to the accused to prove innocence, it is up to the accuser (Fairlay) to show enough evidence to convince the community that this user indeed broke their rules and should have his funds locked.
Incorrect! The pendulum is definitely swinging his way, but that doesn't mean he is completely in the clear which is why some members like me still find his activities shady based on the evidence Fairlay provided.
I sincerely Fairlay will settle with any mediators for this case. They have backtracked too many times in the thread and don't look to be willing to make any sort of payments to the user wo has even suggested a compromise in the situation.
True. They are dragging this case unnecessarily and messing up their reputation within this forum. They should have selected efialtis and holydarkness as arbitrators and proceeded sometime back.