But there's a problem with that argument, if a competitor can throw trash to tarnish the name of their competitor's casino so they can lower their sales and clients playing there and to make sure that they will go to their website, the opposite or the defense can be done to protect them too, take for example Casino A tries to bash Casino B that they require KYC or that their games there are so rigged and they don't have any bonuses through the help of an alt account that can't be traced back to them, at first glance that could be the end for Casino B but they Casino B can just always come out and challenge those claims and prove that whatever this alt account is saying, they can easily debunk it. My point here is that it doesn't matter what happens in that scenario, if the casino can debunk the negative claims that are being thrown at them, they will probably be fine.