The way I see it, parents have obligations regarding their children, but not the other way around. Children didn't ask to be born, it's the responsibility of their parents. I don't think it means that parents should sell their houses for their children, though. Parents are responsible for providing an adequate standard of life and ensuring that their children obtain basic education. Then it's up to parents how much they want to help and up to children how much they want to take care of their parents when they get older.
Viewing children as an investment into your own future is very egoistic and pragmatic. I don't think it's a good foundation of a healthy relationship.
Yes I agree with you. After giving birth to a child till he reaches adulthood, parents have to take all the responsibility to guide him and develop his life. But this does not mean that the parents will sell the homestead for the child and spend it on the betterment of the children. First of all it is mandatory to fulfill the basic needs of everyone and then all kinds of measures are needed to upgrade the children with the times. Because that child after a certain age has to fight the earth to save himself and his next generation as you would for your child. Life is a game here those who can fulfill every step of their life very carefully are successful in every way.
The words are undoubtedly true and well said. Because children have to be cared for they have the responsibility to support them until they are able to earn money or until they reach adulthood. This is because if their care or nurturing is stopped before they can earn money their future will be plunged into darkness as they will not be able to grow properly or recognize the right path. They will be able to acquire their work and skills only if they are shown how to get involved in social or extracurricular activities and education in their families. But the more primitive fields are shown for their upbringing, the more they will grow up there is a lot of evidence in the society.