Fairlay wanted a chance to present all evidence to an arbitrator, not everything in public. Unfortunately this case is being tried publicly which Fairlay never asked for. There are times when all information shouldn’t be divulged. Fairlay must prove that the match was fixed but the accusations against them are false. More time is needed to let this all play out. I’m not saying that the match was fixed, but Fairlay has no ill intentions and money isn’t a problem.
At this point, it doesn't really matter whether they have I'll intentions or not to be frank because they messed their own reputation up by going back and forth on their own words for various reasons.
I felt holydarkness would be a great arbitrator too, but they kept changing their words on a whim due to which the pendulum swung in favor of the punter.
From reading what’s on the board, I would take the player’s side but there’s obviously more to the story. Fairlay was going to agree to binding arbitration and it wasn’t from hand picked people. That says more than anything else.