Are you really satisfied with this reply? I find it a bit weak to be honest.
Sure it's good they already refunded the deposit but just claiming OP did arbitration bets ( which in no way harm a site ) sounds kinda easy, doesn't it? Also bobstone wrote "this might be arbitrage or other mechanisms" . So what is it exactly? What kind of explanation is that? Don't they even know what they are accusing OP of? It sounds strange to me to not give any real info.
But I guess we see that all the time in here. Accusations against players but rarely any proof. Players always must send proof of anything but casinos/bookies don't, I never understand that. Why doesn't this apply to both parties?
I think the problem here is user data, Users can share their data at their own will, however, we have data from their correspondences, transaction history, deposits and withdraws etc. that we should not share unless specifically asked to share by the original poster.
There is actually even more confusion to this, as i can't verify with bitcointalk that this is indeed the same user at all, so we can certainly share tit for tat information e.g. on the same grounds, if user posts a screenshot of a transaction, we can post the link to the transaction and etc but no business on a public forum should be displaying the data of users without their explicit permission
hope that clears this part up
Bobstone,
DuckDice Live Support