Why is there a need for quotes? I did not create a narrative, I invited Fairlay to communicate more clearly and transparently from the beginning. The narrative created itself - because Fairlay acts the way they do.
They copied Instagram posts as proof that games are rigged, juggled between potential arbitrators and failed to communicate properly on their strategy going forward. The general consensus is that they don't give a s%&t.

It is also borderline criminal to decide the game is rigged without evidence.

I don't really care if the game is rigged, of course games in amateur sports can be rigged.
That's why you don't allow a 100k$ bet on such markets. If you do - pay up.

You can't have an opinion about it though, you need to have confirmation from the governing body.