The article talks a lot about breaking consensus by miners and that it can't happen but I'm talking about regulators forcing miners to use black-listing (not including certain tx) in a block, which doesn't break the consensus.
Suppose regulators force the miners of their country to blacklist certain transactions. What happens with miners outside their borders? They cannot force their behavior. The anti-censorship miners will normally mine any transaction, and the pro-censorship miners have the choice to either accept the chain with the most work (which would make their blacklisting pointless and financially damaging), or blacklist the most worked chain if it contains blacklisted transactions.
Since the former is not an option, good luck with convincing the miners to attack the very essence of Bitcoin.