Don't you get tired of playing dumb?
I could ask you the same thing. You've been trotting out the same wrong arguments for years, and nobody here gives a damn anymore. Get a clue and come back with something original.
Value can only be assigned to something actual - gold, debt, liability to redeem, picture, company, computer program, patent, etc.
Again with this narrow-minded (and frankly, stupid) argument? By whose definition? How do you define "something actual"? Or do you think that, for example, ideas and thoughts cannot have value?
But... we already talked about this a few years ago, haven't we? It's astounding how you ignore facts that don't fit your narrative.
Oh, and here's the kicker! Bitcoin is essentially
a computer program. So you just contradicted yourself in one sentence. Congratulations!
and now you're forced to play dumb to hide the fact that you participate in the dumbest invention in human history.
Again, by whose definition? Yours? Let's be honest, your previous blunders haven't exactly screamed 'financial' nor 'technology guru.' So, I'm genuinely curious - what qualifies you to be the authority on this subject?
Ideas are something actual, computer programs are something actual. But when you pay $700,000 you didn't buy 10 ideas or 10 computer programs. You bought digits "1" and "0". In other word, you bought 10 empty numeric units of a Bitcoin system. It is crazy how you Bitcoin evangelists keep mentioning actual things, such as gold, paintings, collectables, ideas, computer programs,.. but are unable to say what actual thing you have when you bought xx BTC units. And when it is demonstrated with simple syllogisms that you have nothing than you engage in ad hominem attacks, playing dumb or simply trolling the discussion. You're a perfect example of that.