its VERY curious that one Fairlay defender stops posting and then another account is created and starts to pitch a different defense idea trying to TEACH the users different things.
Let me teach you something also.
The article you linked mentions FRIENDLY games, meaning there were UNOFFICIAL games. The federation in question even said they did not take place.
In this thread the matches in questions are OFFICIAL matches easily provable by the many federations in questions even MONTHS after they took place.
See the difference? OFFICIAL versus UNOFFICIAL.
Second thing, the bookies DO NOT HAVE the right to decide a match was fixed or not. If a crime was committed, only police or the local courts can decide that.
See the difference? POLICE versus a bookie that lost money on a game and want to make it like it was fixed.
What's interesting is that three posters with activity over 3000 say the match was fixed. Most with less say it wasn't fixed. See the difference. If no other major bookmakers took large wagers than no one is going to look in to this fixed match. Hundreds of matches are fixed in football, tennis, ping pong. Even if it is investigated it can take a year and the bookmaker has to make a quick decision.