Well that's the problem, the Chelsea owner does not give the coach the opportunity to build a squad in the long term and they want to see instant results even though they must be able to take examples from the last 2 seasons and at the same time prove that money does not guarantee a team's success. If Chelsea want to build a young squad then they have to give the coach more time at least 3-5 years as happened with Arsenal and Liverpool, as we know Arsenal's performance continues to improve from season to season and I think this season is the time for Arsenal.
I'm Chelsea fan, and I've watched how my club have surpassed the struggling limits and now settled for lesser poor results. This is out of the picture and I've come to realized that time is perfectly the stable form ought to be give to these assigned coaches. But everything turn up against our expectations, we're seeing different outcome. Chelsea is elite team but everything worked smoothly during the era of Abramovic, he made good use of his players and signed appropriate talent players. Chelsea owner, Todd Boehly is impatience and have placed down the instructed maps.
Maybe the difference in profession between Abramovich and Todd Boehly is what makes Chelsea's handling different. Where Abramovich was famous as a politician before becoming the owner of Chelsea and it was proven that he had a more effective strategy on how to make a team like Chelsea successful and become as big as it is now. Meanwhile, Todd Boehly is a businessman and I think what he does is only focused on how this team works according to the market and doesn't know how to process the players who come in.
So what we see now has turned away from the Abramovich era and Chelsea now seems to have no direction in determining their success and in my opinion they are just following along with other big teams in bringing in new players without having their own research on how to run their squad in this competition.