I don’t blame any of their coaches they signed or any player for their poor performance, in fact, I am putting the blame on the management and the owners for lacking patience with managers just because of the money they blindly spent on signing players and because they want quick results.
Take Arsenal for example; they spent some money for players, but they gave the manager some time to build his team, now Arteta is doing well since he was able to build his team and can now perform very well in all competitions. Despite Arteta not winning trophies, Arsenal management were patient, but I am sure they will win title next season.
Chelsea management did gave Graham Potter time though, how well did he do the job? They gave him too much tike but he did flop and let down the management.
Todd Boehly is good with selling and making profits from players but I feel like he should just play hus role as CEO and allow those who are experienced in that field do their work for the club.
Why the Comparisons between Arsenal and Chelsea?
Arsenal knows they have a good manager for longer term plans, as for Chelsea I can't say, I'm just keen to see how Enzo Maresca performance for the club.
I'm sure in my heart that he'll definitely be successful with that.
Yeah right. When it comes to management one person cannot do it all alone. And there are persons who are gifted or should i say talented in some specific areas. Since the management of a club comprises of management of the players and management of the affairs of the club. A coach should be given full right to manage the players given to him to work with. He should have the right to decide who to choose to join the team so that such players will execute the plans he had for the team. Most time the player given to a coach is one that has been highly hyped which is not what the coach wants for the team yet he will have no choice but to manage such players.