Chelsea management did gave Graham Potter time though, how well did he do the job? They gave him too much tike but he did flop and let down the management.
Todd Boehly is good with selling and making profits from players but I feel like he should just play hus role as CEO and allow those who are experienced in that field do their work for the club.
Graham Potter was not given too much time but the little time they gave him, he miss used it because many fans believed in him before they signed him from Brighton; when he joined them, his performance and reputation as a good coach drops until he get sacked.
Todd Boehly has never gain when it comes to transfer of player because since he joined the team, he and his management has been spending money to buy reputable players, but sold out some average players with low market value.
Why the Comparisons between Arsenal and Chelsea?
Arsenal knows they have a good manager for longer term plans, as for Chelsea I can't say, I'm just keen to see how Enzo Maresca performance for the club.
I'm sure in my heart that he'll definitely be successful with that.
If Chelsea has given Pochettihnho time, he could have done more in the coming season, but they sacked him just because they are eying young coach that they feel will do some good jobs just as Arteta is used to do; they can now give Enzo Maresca some time to build the team.