I do not know about other countries but in my country, politics has compromised the economy growth with equity.
As the transition of power evolves, the value of the citizens are depreciated in the eyes of the governments which now optimizes citizens to rely living in fortitude of bravery and accepting challenges so that we don't give it all up hopelessly.
We fight it out by ourselves like there is no government to provide us with some basic amenities and quite better to be called "a daylight robbery or extortion" that once individuals has struggled to make productive differences from the economy slavery chain of the government, you would be will assigned to revenue on taxations.
My question.... If the government could find utilizations on the citizens for taxations on generating funds for infrastructures and other government services , why don't they invest on the citizens or support those with the potentials to productiveness knowing quite well that once they makes success, they would be demanded to also contributed to the growing structures of the economy?
What the government knows is that if a successful individual refuses to comply with the government order, they will get you frustrated tending to fold your productiveness qualities or you go to jail.
So, why don't they tax the poor who barely struggle to eat?:Simply because they found those set of citizens useless and the prison will be occupied if charge them for not paying taxes since there are more Poor people than the rich in the society.
We do know that when it comes to taxation then they would really be surely focusing into those big fish or something that would be giving out results in a short period time rather than they would really be making out some considerations on taking up some focus into its citizens on which they dont even know if these people would really be that paying up their taxes on the moment that they would really be landing with their own jobs and other things that they are getting involved into. This is why they wont really be wasting up those funds to be that putting up focus into its citizens. They will really be surely sticking into those things on which they do know that they could really be able to take advantage with. This is why on the moment that they would really be needing up to choose then it would be understandable with that obvious thing.
It is really just that sad that they would really be focusing into those single point but still not all places or countries wont really be that having that kind of priority in towards into their
citizens on which there are indeed places that do really give out that benefit.