I received the payment for this week.
If you guys have any doubt just check the BTC address of the users who are accepted in this campaign ☺️
Look at their transaction's history.
Well, this just shows that the campaign is actually paying, but the requirements for participants to get paid is somewhat not clear.
- No spreadsheet to start with
- Users are being removed without proper explanation whatsoever.
- Their signature code isn't that attractive as well. I will suggest paying a signature designer for their signatures if they want to get noticed.
I hope that the OP/Manager will share some things on what's happening right now. There are some red flags indeed, but it can easily get solved IMO. They paid their participants in the first week of the campaign like @yazher said (although the transaction ID isn't posted here like what campaign managers usually does), so I guess they are willing to pay (at least for now). Let's give them some time to explain.

In that case the manager should come open and explain to their participants the reasons why they some of them didn't get their payments so that others can also take precautions. It is good for a manager maintain a good understanding with their campaign participants instead of keeping some of them in the dark and from my observation I can see some angry participants expressing their grievance already so all these doesn't go down well with a campaign that was just launched a week ago.
I advice the campaign manager to come and clarify their participants of the campaign rules they violated so that it can be corrected in the upcoming week(s) except they don't have long term targets for this company they represent in their signature campaign.
However, this campaign lacks quality as there are no campaign thread, spreadsheet, ANN thread and so on. No quality advertising codes and Avatar, No quality designs and these are some of the many things that will demoralize some big shoes from considering applying for this campaign.