Lol...I can't stop laughing here cause I don't know which angle you are bringing this from and what it tends to justify.
I'm not trying to approach this from any particular angle. I'm simply stating the facts. Taking someone's property without their consent constitutes theft. We can debate whether this is essential for a nation to function effectively, but it doesn't change the fundamental definition of the act.
"Tax is never a theft and never will it be regardless of how you may interpret it."
Alright, then. I don't need to answer to anything below. We disagree on a very fundamental level. You clearly have another definition for the word "theft".