Edit: How will the forum look at the fact that there is plagiarism in the manager’s story? You can check the creation dates of the site from which the post was copied. Is it necessary to block a manager for the fact that, at the development stage, the manager did not speak in his own words but copied them from another site? Previously, it sounded like a scam.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1926895.msg64306824#msg64306824 Good find but since cryptomus_com represents a platform account and a quote it as "financial technology specialists say:," it will not be banned. This will be a good reason for those who want to give them a negative trust.
I also received the PM from the manager says he was forced to remove me without pay and immediately pmed him back that he should review my post history because I didn't violate any rule of the campaign and all my posts were on point. And I woke up to see that I was paid. But I don't know if I will be paid next week.
For this case, neutral trust is sufficient, especially since what is happening indicates unprofessionalism, not scam.
If they were scammers, they would launch a $300 campaign for 100 users and then delete 80 per week.
In general, there are many negative indicators, and if the team does not respond within the next 24 hours, I ill support trust flag.