Why are we all suddenly so sure that the responsible AR-15 owner wasn't just casually hunting or whatever it is that responsible AR-15 owners do with their responsibly owned AR-15s. Why do we have to assume the worst.
I guess good guys with guns were supposed to prevent these things, so why wasn't everyone there carrying? I mean everyone on the gathering are pro open carry, just like the shooter was.
You'll be shocked when you find out that people had to pass through metal detectors and were not allowed to carry guns inside the event. It's almost as if the constitution doesn't apply to Trump or something.
The guy with the big gun killed the guy with the gun -> freedom to carry weapons with no particular reason nor checks is good because you can kill people who are using their right to carry weapons (without any particular reason nor checks) when they do the type of thing that people who buy weapons (without "any particular reason" and that would not ever pass a check) do the type of stuff they do with weapons.
But that is fine, every twenty year old in the US gets a chance to kill candidates - what could go wrong?