My questions seemed unnecessarily provocative (although it wasn't meant), which, in fact, in the context of the role of merit source, is difficult to answer clearly and directly, which is confirmed by this comment.

But I am satisfied with the sincerity and reasonableness of Lucius’s answer. Which, in my opinion, confirms the worthiness of this candidate for the role of merit source. If the user has the opportunity (time) and desire (to view many other people’s posts), then why not satisfy his request.

Regarding the application (who first submitted an application is considered first) for taking up the position of merit-source, it seems to me that one should not adhere to, because the debate (consideration of applications) regarding some may drag on, which will slow down subsequent candidates. If the user meets all the criteria and is approved, then there is no point in keeping him on the bench. It is necessary to give the opportunity to begin performing duties as soon as they are ready.