The topic of Trump may become boring but clearly supporting him can create new opportunities for us beyond what the current administration is creating.
The way I see it now, it is Trump who needs Bitcoin more. It fits into the attempt to sell himself as a progressive candidate. Bitcoin will be fine for 4 years whoever is the president during that period.
It's another reason Kamala should not join the conference, at least don't join it will help her to avoid additional damage on her election program for very last months before the election.
She should have not been invited at all, except it was an attempt to hurt her campaign by asking her some tough, difficult to get out of questions.
- Jay -
With politicians or not, bitcoin market continues to exist. However, with the endorsement of the next US President would create further demand and so the increase of price is imminent. Trump may be pro-crypto but once he is elected, do you really think it would be easy to pass a crypto-related bill?