There was a post in earlier in this topic by tranthidung who counted the scam accusations, applied a little math magic on it to show the overall 40-60% of the scam accusation complaints are valid when you have big enough sample. While this number is far from 100%, it definitely shows that it is not true that the most or even the majority of accusations are false or invalid. It is about 50-50.
Here it is:
-snip-
Thank you for this, and like what I just argued with a user this week, the higher percentage of the allegations against casinos might be true. But of course, there are some bad and ugly actors as well who either want to avenge their losses in a senseless way or are sent by rival companies or just being idiotic to cause tension where there is none. This is why we should be so sensitive in reading and digesting allegations/reviews. But in average, I am sure that the allegations are valid and more reason we should treat each case differently before taking sides.
However, judging by the statistics above, I still like people to take it easily with big casinos in terms of the number and percentage of complainers. It can be so deceptive for a lesser casino with just 500 customers with 5 complainers (1% of customers) compared to big casinos with over 5,000,000 customers with 150 complainers (0.003%). You can see by the comparison arithmetic, that the big casinos are still doing better than the lesser casinos despite the big number attached to them.