There are a huge number of experts,
Pseudo-experts or fraudsters hiding under the guise of experts.
but expertise does not mean that a person can make money on forecasts.
Everything is just the opposite:
if expertise implies the ability to monetize your knowledge and skills. If a person who calls himself an expert is not able to make money (based on his expertise, and not on fraud with other people's money that was given to a pseudo-expert), then he is not an expert at all.
That is literally where the bone of contention is held. If he can actually give a guaranteed predicted games, why don't him go make some money from the casino instead of the request that an individual has to pay him to give out the sure games as claimed expert but non.
I was yet to hear his expertise history in the news or seeing an audience testifying of his legitimate claims of being a gambling expert.
He actually failed at his demand of getting paid in the first place otherwise to prove himself, he would had given out the games for a trial at first to gain the trust.
He was just a suspect to me when I realized he could use such expert knowledge to bankrupt the casino with his excessive winnings so, why coming to me so has lost more than enough already to the casino in demand to get him paid before giving me a game as an expert he is.
Totally. That's a good question and a good way to find out
If a person can't proof his profit being made out of his knowledge, then there is not point in copying that person, especially paying for that in the process.