A good casino will make sure there are no minors playing and I reckon that is much more difficult if they accept crypto and they do no KYC or little KYC. Thus, I think it is for the parents to exercise the oversight of the sites the underage people have access to and how they manage their money and even their crypto. Again that is quite difficult, but there is nothing easy about being a parent is there?
You are absolutely right, sometimes being a Parent is not easy at al l, one thinks that children do not know certain things, and they are so impressive that they are capable of memorizing long passwords (access) in Seconds and they can also make a Difference because there are systems where they understand them quickly and are so expert that they are capable of camouflaging themselves very well when one as a parent goes to supervise them , I mean, they are too smart, so in these things one has to be much Smarter than them, learn certain tools so that they cannot Manipulate us.
At this point in particular, I believe that it should be a joint responsibility between parents and the casino company:
- Parents are required to monitor their children's behavior in general, including the budgets they give them and the permissions to use other payment sources such as applications and electronic cards. In addition to finding/creating ways that allow them to monitor their activities on the Internet because gambling is not the only unwanted activity for children.
Any parent who does not perform these functions is necessarily evading his responsibilities and his negligence may be punishable in many cases.
- Casino companies should bear direct responsibility if there is any indication that a user may be under the legal age. This is not only a service to the child, which I doubt the casino will care much about, but it is also for the benefit of the platform itself, which may bear huge losses if it is confirmed that it allows children to use the site.