I am glad to see how meticulously and patiently holydarkness is bringing out the root of the matter. Kudos for your efforts. I have been observing recent debates (I am not sure if we can categorize them as such 
) between holydarkness and Rating Place, and I believe there is a common theme (misconception from holydarkness's POV) that he always goes soft on casinos while Rating Place most of the time acquires a harsh tone against casinos.
My hunch is holydarkness has built some rapport with casinos (and his hard work must be recognized for that as it is not an easy thing to do) while serving as a long-standing medium between casinos and this forum. He wants to maintain that rapport as it might be essential to investigate/speed up cases. Does this mean we should moderate our skepticism against unaccountable (Curaçao license holders) mammoths? I do not think so, and this is, IMHO, what Rating Place is doing. I can feel him going hard on casinos and showing support (even sometimes without evidence ) to players. While I totally appreciate the efforts (I wish I could be that energetic) of holydarkness, I just want to say that this time I sense a bully in you, which was totally unnecessary.
Regarding the case, if OP can show that in the past he made successful bets and cashed out using his current IP location in question (which led to the ban), then the casino is at fault.
) between holydarkness and Rating Place, and I believe there is a common theme (misconception from holydarkness's POV) that he always goes soft on casinos while Rating Place most of the time acquires a harsh tone against casinos.My hunch is holydarkness has built some rapport with casinos (and his hard work must be recognized for that as it is not an easy thing to do) while serving as a long-standing medium between casinos and this forum. He wants to maintain that rapport as it might be essential to investigate/speed up cases. Does this mean we should moderate our skepticism against unaccountable (Curaçao license holders
) mammoths? I do not think so, and this is, IMHO, what Rating Place is doing. I can feel him going hard on casinos and showing support (even sometimes without evidence ) to players. While I totally appreciate the efforts (I wish I could be that energetic) of holydarkness, I just want to say that this time I sense a bully in you, which was totally unnecessary.Regarding the case, if OP can show that in the past he made successful bets and cashed out using his current IP location in question (which led to the ban), then the casino is at fault.
I've been playing from long ago in rollbit, I don't know how can I prove that I made bets and withdraws with spanish IP(I did it) (they have it in their system 100%, but they INSTA BAN me when i sent my ID, I didn't make screenshot at all because wasn't thinking that was rollbit plans).
But I can make another acc and make the same behaviour as mine ban, so I could prove it, for now I won't because I've did KYC as requested and Rollbit doesn't want me in their page, but if they answer me saying no money for me, if is needed I will do it to prove that you can bet deposit withdraw with spanish IP until you are a profitable player, if u are a loser like I was for months you are more than welcome.
By the way I've edited my first message of this topic, because I explain the way rollbit works with restricted players and as I wrote, I think you can feel my frustration, because this is intentional.