This Chelsea new manager to me is confused on what to say concerning the team after losing to Manchester City he still had to come out and say it was because of the pitch on which both teams played on that was why the squad performaned badly and that was why they conceded those goals. I only see a man who will complain at any given opportunity and not a coach that's ready to take the fall for the team and make amends.
Enzo Maresca is one lucky man because if it was the former owner he would have been thinking on how to replace him because he can't even work understand pressure especially when the team is losing, he can't make some changes that would change the outcome of the game to his favor. I don't know how he's going to do it but I hope the players can help him out because the journey of next season is going to be hard for the coach.
For crying out loud this Man was just appointed and he is yet to play any official match with Chelsea as a Club. How many coaches in the world that can play against Pep Guardiola side and get a win? Do you want the man to criticize his players or what do you want him to say. He did the right thing by just attributing the loss to the bad nature of the pitch. Sometimes it is not about the coach, it's also about the players who are not implementing the ideas of the coach correctly that often lead to a loss in a football match. You see this idea of Chelsea always sacking coaches, that's the reason why Chelsea has continued to decline in terms of output on the field. The fans of Chelsea are getting use to seeing their coaches sacked and it's becoming a problem for the Club. Most managers going to Chelsea has this in mind and it's making them not to be fully committed to the club. Because they already knew that they could be sack any moment. The Man won some of his preseason matches, why not give him some credit for that.