Post
Topic
Board Scam Accusations
Re: Serious Questions About Shuffle.com (Launched by FTX Employee)
by
holydarkness
on 05/08/2024, 17:30:51 UTC
Quote
1. Noah Dummett's FTX Connection:
While it's true that Noah has been open about his past employment, the concern is not just about his previous jobs but the potential replication of problematic operational practices. Transparency and accountability are crucial, especially given the legal issues surrounding FTX. Comparing this situation to BitMEX doesn't negate the need for scrutiny. It's not about doing a better job than the FBI, but about continuous vigilance and ensuring ongoing transparency in Shuffle.com's operations to prevent similar issues.

Quote
2. Anonymous Key Personnel:
While privacy is important, the use of aliases by key personnel in a financial service raises red flags. Transparency about the identities of key decision-makers is critical to building trust, especially in the wake of major financial collapses like FTX. Anonymity can be exploited for malicious purposes, and it's in the community's interest to know who is handling their funds.

Quote
3. Potential Operational Similarities to FTX:
Operational practices are fundamental to the integrity of any financial platform. If Shuffle.com is using similar systems to those that failed at FTX, it poses a significant risk. Accessing this data might be challenging, but it's essential for stakeholders to push for audits and transparency to ensure that the same mistakes are not repeated. Bonus systems and user fund management are critical components that can impact the overall stability and fairness of the platform.

Quote
Immediate Actions for Community and Stakeholders
Stakeholders include anyone who has a vested interest in the platform, including users and token holders. Demanding transparency is not only reasonable but necessary to ensure the integrity of the platform. While privacy is important, it should not come at the expense of accountability. Balancing privacy with transparency is key, and there are ways to protect sensitive information while still providing the community with the assurances they need about the platform's operations and the people running it.


OP, please learn to quote properly, or drop the act of not knowing how to quote, it's confusing. I somehow have a feeling that this is a disposable account and you have an existing account here.

Addressing your post as a whole, by the same logic, any company which founded by and/or employ someone who has previously worked in a troublesome company, are worth questioning. Here's a fun fact of life, in case you're lucky and privileged enough to never experienced it first hand: shit happens and mother nature is a bitch.

I don't think it's fair to hold Noah for something that happened on his past employment, is it? Especially as he contributes nothing to the downfall of it?

And anonymous staff, I'll repeat what I said on previous post, I suggest you to PM Noah and see if he'll be kind enough to tell you who work on what and all their background [this is a sarcasm]. Otherwise, gain proper authority and inquire an investigation to their company registration, I believe some name are listed there, real name.

Oh, further, about key personnel in financial services using alias... how sure are you when you call your bank and a customer service answered your call and introduce herself as "Samantha", that's her real name? Or when their financial or loan staff do a telemarketing and offers a loan, the "hi, this is Robert from Barclays" is a real Robert instead of a Nathan Edwardson by birth?