[...]
Oh, still waiting for that accusation for Cam? I believe it's a serious allegation and would like to pursue and/or get it cleared.
Given the nature of your responses, it strongly feels like you might have a personal interest in defending Shuffle. While I understand the importance of a thorough investigation and fair treatment, the lack of existing complaints about Shuffle could simply be due to the platform's low user base. This isn't necessarily indicative of a clean record but rather a reflection of limited exposure and engagement.
As for Cam, the serious allegation regarding his enjoyment of others' suffering and his handling of addiction issues still stands. It's critical to address these concerns transparently. Whether or not he has been formally accused or investigated, the patterns of behavior reported by users suggest a profound lack of empathy and respect for player well-being.
If you are confident in the integrity of Shuffle and Cam, I invite you to provide evidence to clear these serious allegations. The community deserves transparency and accountability, especially when it comes to potential exploitation and unethical behavior.
Additionally, considering the myriad of opportunities within the crypto space, it's perplexing and concerning that Noah would choose to be involved in one of the darkest and least legal aspects of the industry. Why take this path when there are so many legitimate and positive ventures available?
The community's vigilance and proactive inquiry into these practices are crucial, especially as Shuffle.com continues to grow. Ensuring that such behavior is called out and addressed early can prevent further harm and foster a more ethical and transparent environment.
Last I check, I shouldn't have any personal interest in defending Shuffle, since I am not involved with them in any degree imaginable. If you have that strong feeling, it's in your head. But let's address that instead of sweeping them under the rug, which part of my post makes you feel such strong feeling?
Moving to cam, this serves as a comment to your last post above about Cam too, I believe you're the one who initially alleges that their staff, pseudonamed Cam, has a serious issue in addressing gambling addiction, perhaps amongst other trait. So, I believe it should be you that proves the accusation is not baseless and completely founded instead of asking me [or anyone else] to prove that your statement is invalid? Do I understand things backwardly?