~Snip
By tying Bitcoin to Trump, many are building a brand name for Bitcoin that will be both extremely detrimental to its long-term growth, and very hard to get rid of: Bitcoin will be known as a "Trump thing" for a very long time, if not forever. This is a disaster.
The assumptions you make are not wrong, but I am sure that Bitcoin will not end like that, even though Trump is currently associated with Bitcoin. Because in essence everyone already knows that bitcoin was created by satoshi and every bitcoin holder is its owner. So in my opinion Bitcoin cannot be said to belong to Trump, even though for example the price of Bitcoin has increased due to issues related to Trump.
Bitcoin went up 500% under president Biden. Bitcoin doesn't need special favors from a government in order to survive and thrive. But Bitcoin absolutely can be destroyed if Bitcoin is associated with something the American people wish to consign to the ash heap of history.
Bitcoin is a decentralized asset, so obviously no government or community is able to regulate the price of bitcoin absolutely. Maybe the government or community can only influence society and create a cycle that can only affect the price of bitcoin. So the point is that Biden or Trump will clearly not be able to regulate the price of bitcoin in absolute terms. Because bitcoin is currently a very large asset, it will not be easy to manipulate its price to the maximum. Apart from that, Bitcoin can indeed be destroyed, but I think it will be a little difficult. Because as I said above, Bitcoin is a global asset, so destroying it is not an easy matter.
The Bitcoin community should, at minimum, stay out of US politics. But insofar as members do, they should support the moderate status quo in Washington that was present when Bitcoin doubled in value over and over again--in other words, support VP Harris for president and the Democrats.
Yes, I agree with this. However, even if this is done, the impact of US politics will definitely have a significant impact on Bitcoin. So in essence, even though the bitcoin community stays away from American politics, the impact cannot be avoided, because basically everyone who invests in bitcoin already has habits that are difficult to regulate regarding things like this. And regarding presidential choices, Harris might be better, but I haven't studied what kind of person she is, so for now I won't think too much about Trump or Harris.