Yea I remember Warren Buffet famously has never given a dividend, he dislikes it but then he is rich .   There is a difference from that situation to this one I think.    When a company pays its shareholders, its their own money being handed back to them.   They are the owners after all, so on the day its given the company is worth less by the amount now handed back; ex-div this is called.  Its just plain maths or more visually a set scales of movement to the cash.

Here its not quite that here theres differences, the token isnt ownership.   Also no new tokens are being created in that lock payment, they already exist in the sum total & most tokens are held by the website itself I think.   

The dilution idea is not occurring and in fact there is a burn of tokens apparently.  I dont know what % that burn is, not sure if figures are listed somewhere on that.  Shares would be a public company and public accounts, here its not that and its not a share just a token as already said.

  However the market is more liquid when people have 'spare' tokens so that would help a lower price in shorter term time frames.  That would be a price dynamic not value, so long as the total number of tokens isnt altering.
   I believe the daily traded volume might be the best reflection of health, if volume picks up it might also raise price not sure just my rough take overall.

The 50 and 200 day average on BTC are in an eclipse and price just fell from there.  I reckon short term negative but long term positive as moving averages are mostly rising.