Oh, By the Way: I'm going through the Sharecoin thread and it seems that its fair-distribution algo is already being criticized for letting in sockpuppet accounts to enable greedy people to get several stakes for the sweat of one.
It seems that some sort of a judgment call by the dev is indicated.
But of course, we don't want to do that. Judgement calls mean human error and the inevitable accusations of "Scam!" Far better for system gamers to walk off with a free haul rather than introduce "unfair" human judgment into the process.
EDIT: and now we hear from the Sharecoin dev...
Well It won't really be fair, seriously communitycoin given out free had troubles getting 1000 genuine no shill accounts and had to lower it to less then 500, how quick you guys goto over 1000s its a certainty alot of fake accounts are scamming it.
Yes,
no real fair!
There are tons of clone accounts in the first 1,000 applications. It's unfair if I only share the coins to those accounts.
The first 1,000 accounts who applied will get 10% extra coins for being early supporters. Of course, those accounts must not be clone accounts.great , but i think it's better to not change the rule frequently
True, It's our fault. We didn't realise how fast this coin can get popular. That's why we gave up our resevered coins for the first 1,000 people who applied.
Kudos to the guy for taking the blame, by the way. It'll be interesting to see whether this fault-taking pre-empts or encourages a trollstorm.
EDIT 2: Aaaand...
The list of qualified accounts and disqualified accounts will be published 24 hours before the first payment is sent but they will not be published now.
[All bolds added by me. In before the, uh, excitement.]
Of course they'll hunt them down later as well.