Re: All eyes On Trump As Kamal Harris Gives Up On Bitcoin Conference Attendance
I agree, Trump needs bitcoin more because he is taking advantage of its popularity to attract voters for himself, while bitcoin has existed since 2009 and has passed through many presidents. Although the Biden administration has had anti-bitcoin policies during his years in office, we can see that bitcoin is not affected too much. So whoever becomes president won't be able to stop bitcoin's potential, but by betting on Trump, we have a chance to move things forward faster and stronger.
I don't believe Trump can make bitcoin a US national reserve, but if that happens, it would obviously be a huge step forward for bitcoin, which is why I support him instead Kamal Harris or Biden.
I don't believe Trump can make bitcoin a US national reserve, but if that happens, it would obviously be a huge step forward for bitcoin, which is why I support him instead Kamal Harris or Biden.
Yes. It would be great if the US has its own Bitcoin reserves. Just like it had its own Gold reserves in the past. But first things first. Trump and his team would need to focus on cutting down domestic and foreign spending to put a halt on the rising national debt. Then we can talk about "reds and roses" with Bitcoin. Without a solution to the US' inherent economic problems, adopting BTC at its fullest won't make any difference.
The crypto industry already sided with Trump, anyways. Fingers crossed he wins the presidential race. Otherwise, crypto will move a step backwards under Kamala Harris' leadership. If the economy was in shambles during Biden's presidency, what makes you think Harris will be any better? Americans must choose wisely for the good of their country (and the rest of the world). The future is unpredictable, so lets hope for the best.
