@franky1, it's clear that you are not really listening.
Here in this comment:
[...] and services can also delay the withdrawal of the funds so the attacker wont try instigating the attack until after the withdrawal clears to ensure when they finally go backward X blocks they get to truly double spend. it then becomes unworthy of attacking the network just to get a refund, because CEX have other mitigating factors
Isn't this exactly that 'extend the confirmation time' idea I was talking about? You
know that this isn't going to do anything to prevent an attack on that scale,
no.. its about YOU need to run scenarios based on the CURRENT mitigating delays services put on the deposits and withdrawals to cause a attacker to have to wait out clearing their settled other currency.. to then go backwards..
its not about asking services to change things from now on..
you are saying that "no, it isn't about extending the confirmation time," and then in the same breath you saying that it is about "delay services" instead. Unless you can somehow explain to me that "delay services" isn't about 'extending the confirmation time,' I will regard you as being dishonest.
You also give me a "hint" that:
but here is a hint which i did mention already
if a large value transaction got undone. services can red flag a utxo that got undone and if any exchange then got a deposit of that same utxo spend a second time then they can just ban the user from doing any market orderbook trades, (there are other things too but.. before you can run through those factors you need to first walk through the basics factors discussed already and not bypass them
This either assumes that attackers need to do several reorgs in order for the attack to work, or that the attackers are somehow reliant on being accepted by specific crypto exchanges after the attack. If you had paid attention (i.e. to me explaining about the long-range attack above, or the fact that the ultimate goal is to
crash the market), you would know that neither of these things are relevant. So either you are not paying attention or you are being dishonest.
As for your whole tactic of avoiding argument by pretending that you know something that I don't while being unwilling to say
what that is, and at the same time pretending that I'm the one not listening to your arguments while hardly doing anything to point us back to whatever arguments that would be... Well, I don't think I'm the only one who sees through that tactic.
Please stop that behavior, or just leave the thread.