blah blah blah shows you are still not ready to even run your theory through your own head properly

so knowing you jsut want best wishes of pretending ethereum could crash the market of bitcoin lets really ram it home to you that you have not thought about things much but just want to mention a theory several times without much thought

firstly you mention not wanting to do multiple re-orgs of bitcoin ledger...
well then your 51% attack ends at the first and only re-org and all your other fluff and chest beating is not about 51% attacking to generate revenue to then push onto the market to crash bitcoin, but instead you simply trading currency on different markets hoping your efforts on the market wont get countered by other whales on the same markets

again if you only want to do one re-org and then play the markets, guess what there are other whales that will arbitrage counterclockwise to then crash the ethereum market to cycle their way back to the btc-usd market to then grow the btc back after each sell off you attempt

but most importantly about your last multiple posts arguing how you wont need multiple re-orgs of the btc blockchain... by you concentrating on the whole bob-eric market shuffle.. has nothing to do with blockchain manipulating, its just market manipulation

so why are you really here talking about 51% attacking if most of your waffle is about market manipulation methods to cycle funds to then keep dipping the market.. even when (if you run your scenarios) knew your dips would then be followed by BTC whales counter arbitraging your tactics on the market

please stop relying with your fagrance of debate about how you feel your theory is untouchable and strong and guaranteed... without any knowledge on your part of all the mitigating circumstances that can play out against your theory.. and instead realise if you are not intending to do repetitive re-orgs, there is no point in you even starting with a 51% attack by wasting funds on hardware, and instead just skip to the market manipulation tactics you then discuss as your real intended attack method, by directly funding the bob-eric method without needing to waste funds on a 51% repeated attack..

please dont reply with an emotional expression.. just run the scenarios out and play devils advocate on your own theory and realise how the risks and mitigations show your success rate is low of your 51% invested method.. and then realise what went wrong and then work out other ways if you wanted to use the same $XXb investments