I mean it's clear that Kamala Harris is not after the "may change their vote based on crypto stance" folk,
She isn't, and neither is Trump--because there is virtually
zero votes for such a thing. Very few Americans even care about their Bitcoin holdings to the point that they would think about it politically
at all, and even the ones who do aren't going to trade away their rights to a their own body (Trump's promised abortion laws) just to make their Bitcoin go up a little.
What both are going after is crypto
donations from billionaire Bitcoin whales.
I think that Trump is trying to get votes from crypto enthusiasts. To be honest, I think it isn't worth the effort to work on crypto audience votes because their number is tiny and it's 50/50 whether crypto holders will really vote for Trump for his crypto vision or not.
Btw from which billionaire Bitcoin whales do they expect donations? I can't think about any of them. Most of the whales are anonymous, aren't they? And the rest of them are exchanges, mixers and casinos.
Under Biden, ETFs for Bitcoin and Ether were approved, and Bitcoin went up 500% under president Biden.
This has absolutely nothing to do with Biden or Trump or Barack Obama. It's a post-halving syndrome.
When compare to Kamala, I still believe that Trump is the one who may do something good for crypto community and with that belief I hope that Trump may get more votes than Kamala and win the elections. I must say that if he might take U-turns then we should get a lesson that never trust a politicians promises.
Trump isn't going to do anything good for the crypto community. If you read his statements, it's clear that he is against the philosophy of Satoshi and Bitcoin.