Gambling an activity for fun also has the chance to turn someone's fortune. Calculated risk when taken in gambling can be the way to big wins from gambling. Who do you think should take more risk in gambling? The rich gambler or the gambler who is not yet rich. If a rich gambler takes risks in gambling, they are risking losing money and becoming poor from gambling, or getting richer, when a gambler who is not yet rich gambles, they can also get poorer or richer, so the gambler who should take the risk should be the gambler who can handle the dangers of the risk like losing too. When a rich gambler loses from taking a risk, there is a better chance of them being in a position to manage with the losses, than someone struggling financially who a big loss will really affect. So, I am confused after asking myself this question and answering it, does this mean a poor gambler should continue to play it safe in gambling? With no risk, how can a poor gambler change their fortune in gambling?
When a rich person and a poor person both have an account on a gambling site, but that gambling site does not verify who has the amount of money, but everyone is equal and can gamble there with as much money as they want. The only thing a rich person can do is to gamble because he has a lot of money, but the idea that a rich person's gambling strategy will always be better than a poor person's is wrong. There are many poor gamblers who gamble according to plan and according to plan they get a lot of success from gambling but the opposite happens with rich people. We see that despite having a lot of money, they lose all their wealth by gambling with the wrong strategy. So those who are good at not considering the rich and the poor, but decision-making ability, withdrawal of excessive greed and gambling skills, will be more likely to achieve success in gambling.