That's what we have to realize especially in gambling experience (even if it's a good site) sometimes the experience is not the same and it could be that what others think is good is not very good for us so that initial research is important to make sure that the site we play is really usable.
Actually, in this case, the reviews made by other people can be a benchmark but in the end it certainly does not have to be the main choice because after all we have to feel (play on the site) to test whether it is worth it or not.
But in some conditions this also does not need to be done if the review for the gambling site is bad because after all we don't need to force it if many people have said that the site is bad then why do we try it.
Yeah. Indeed, if you have seen a fairly large number of negative reviews or complaints about some casino and you clearly understand that this is not a coordinated information attack on this site from competitors and for anti-advertising purposes, then you should not waste your time reading reviews at all about this casino.
And of course, you don’t need to try to play it yourself; you just need to add it to your personal “black list” of the casino and simply forget about its existence.
There can be positive or negative news about different casino sites in different places because there are a lot of casino sites in the market and new casino sites are coming, so different anti companies also try to attack technically to leave others behind in this competitive business and grow their own company. to be honest I don't follow any site to choose casino sites. I only use the casino sites on this forum. Because the reputable members here I think they will never give good feedback for any real casino site. So I choose a reliable casino site based on their reviews.