I did not calculate any scores, because due to the size of WabiSabi coinjoin, the program would never finish. However, coinjoins with variable amounts will have less Boltzmann score.
Let's compare these two coinjoins:
6 outputs for 0.05 BTC:
https://mempool.space/tx/9ada85c1115b6eba29e1b119e6f47de3417d9f2997129d61af1b12338ce4de016 outputs for 0.05 BTC + 195 other outputs with variable amounts:
https://mempool.space/tx/24e7f4c6fbdabd8cd8499fbfd407894c4a590cf5d355937436d08dd8e8c5ecb3Explain why the presence of the 195 other outputs makes the second coinjoin less private than the first one.
Strawman. I never said it does not display your coins being rejected. I said it does not warn for a Sybil attack. Just because some of your funds are rejected, or just because you can't participate in a coinjoin, does not tell whether the coordinator is Sybil attacking you, or whether the chain analysis firm simply disapproves your coins.
It's not a strawman, if you are still unsatisfied with the client's detection system, why don't you simply ask your friend to join the same coinjoin round as you to verify there's no Sybil attack taking place?