There can be positive or negative news about different casino sites in different places because there are a lot of casino sites in the market and new casino sites are coming, so different anti companies also try to attack technically to leave others behind in this competitive business and grow their own company. to be honest I don't follow any site to choose casino sites. I only use the casino sites on this forum. Because the reputable members here I think they will never give good feedback for any real casino site. So I choose a reliable casino site based on their reviews.
I understand you until the point where you contradict yourself. You might want to clarify what you meant by "I don't follow any site to choose casino sites" and "I choose a reliable casino site based on their reviews." For me, you will have to follow sites if you would review casinos as you can't do it all by yourself. Even if forums are your preference, you still visit sites and nowhere is safe from ingenuine reviews that you are trying to avoid. What I do is read the review cleverly and insightfully, this has helped me to average the truth of any reviewing sites as many of the fake reviews are easily detected and there are some genuine reviews as well where the reviewer will be directly and indirectly guilty (not the casino now). This can easily be known by their own words if you are wise about the reading.
So I don't limit my review to this forum as we need to wisely know what we are committing our money to. What if they are pretending here and give the best service to anyone they can identify here but are worse elsewhere? Or they are fair with 90% of their customs and unfair with 10%, and fortunately, all the members of this forum are among the 90% they are fair to knowingly or unknowing and due to that you joined but unfortunately you become one of the 10% they are not fair to? That is why wiser review is important.
However, what I will not do is review a casino through a reviewer who is the one controlling the website or through a certain social media handle, they could have been paid.